<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Support-Resistance — OHLCV</title><link>https://ohlcv.io/tags/support-resistance/</link><description>Quant trading research and writing</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-au</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 01:03:13 +1100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ohlcv.io/tags/support-resistance/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Do levels at round numbers hold?</title><link>https://ohlcv.io/posts/round-numbers/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +1100</pubDate><guid>https://ohlcv.io/posts/round-numbers/</guid><description>Traders treat round prices as support and resistance. In 16 years of one-second data in six CME futures, price that reaches a round level goes through it more often than price that reaches an ordinary one, and least often turns back one tick past it. Approaches to round levels also seem to stall short of them a little more often, though that result is less firm. We checked the findings tick by tick, against placebo levels, and a dozen other ways.</description></item></channel></rss>